Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® °íÁ¤¿ø°ú SWA on masse sliding retraction ½Ã ÀüÄ¡ºÎ Ä¡Ãà Á¶Àý ¿äÀο¡ °üÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÇؼ®

Factors influencing the axes of anterior teeth during SWA on masse sliding retraction with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element study

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2006³â 36±Ç 5È£ p.339 ~ 348
Á¤Çý½É, ¹®À±½Ä, Á¶¿µ¼ö, Àӽ¹Î, ¼º»óÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤Çý½É ( Jeong Hye-Sim ) - ¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ±³Á¤°ú
¹®À±½Ä ( Moon Yoon-Shik ) - ¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ±³Á¤°ú
Á¶¿µ¼ö ( Cho Young-Soo ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ BK21 ±â°è»ç¾÷´Ü
Àӽ¹Π( Lim Seung-Min ) - ¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ±³Á¤°ú
¼º»óÁø ( Sung Sang-Jin ) - ¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ±³Á¤°ú

Abstract

±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® °íÁ¤¿øÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ±³Á¤ Ä¡·á°¡ º¸ÆíÈ­µÇ¸ç, SWA¿Í À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ on masse sliding retraction Àº ÀÓ»ó¿¡¼­ ÈçÈ÷ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â Ä¡·á¹ýÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °íÁ¤¿øÀ» ¼º°øÀûÀ¸·Î º¸Á¸ÇÏ·Á´Â ³ë·Â¿¡ ºñÇØ, ¹ßÄ¡ °ø°£ Æó¼â½Ã ÀüÄ¡ºÎ Ä¡Ãà Á¶Àý¿¡ °ü¿©ÇÏ´Â ¿äÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸°í´Â ¾ÆÁ÷±îÁö ºÎÁ·ÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Á¦1¼Ò±¸Ä¡¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇÑ »ó¾Ç Ä¡¾Æ¿Í Ä¡ÁÖ ÀÎ´ë ±×¸®°í Ä¡Á¶°ñ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ 3Â÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ±âÁظðµ¨À» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´°í, Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¿Í Á¦2¼Ò±¸Ä¡ »çÀÌ ÁÖÈ£¼± 10 mm »ó¹æ¿¡ ½Ä¸³µÈ ±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®¸¦ °íÁ¤¿øÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì, ÃøÀýÄ¡-°ßÄ¡ »çÀÌÀÇ °ßÀÎ ÈÅÀÇ ³ôÀ̸¦ º¯È­½ÃÅ°¸ç ÈÄ»ó¹æ °ßÀηÂÀ» °¡Çϰųª, ÁÖÈ£¼±¿¡ º¸»ó ¸¸°îÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀüÄ¡ºÎ Ä¡Ãà Á¶Àý¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´ÂÁö ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀüÄ¡ºÎ Ä¡ÃàÀÌ ¼³Ãø °æ»çµÈ ¸ðµ¨À» °°Àº ½ÇÇè Á¶°ÇÀ¸·Î ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ÇÏ¿© ¹ßÄ¡ °ø°£ Æä¼â ½Ã ¼³Ãø °æ»çµÈ ÀüÄ¡ºÎ Ä¡ÃàÀ» À¯ÁöÇϰųª °³¼±ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» °ËÅäÇÏ¿´°í, ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº ¿¬±¸ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 2 mm ³ôÀÌÀÇ °ßÀÎ ÈÅ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ÈÄ»ó¹æÀ¸·Î °ßÀηÂÀ» °¡ÇÒ °æ¿ì ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÇÔÀÔ·ÂÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ÀüÄ¡ºÎ ¼³Ãø °æ»ç°¡ ´õ °¨¼ÒµÇÁö´Â ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. °ßÀÎ ÈÅÀÇ ³ôÀÌ°¡ 5 mmÀÎ °æ¿ì ÈÄ»ó¹æ °ßÀηÂÀ» °¡Çϸé, ÃøÀýÄ¡ÀÇ Ä¡°ü ¼øÃø ¹× Ä¡±Ù ¼³Ãø À̵¿ÀÌ ÀϾ°í, °ßÄ¡ÀÇ ºñÁ¶Àý¼º ÈÄ¹æ °æ»ç À̵¿ÀÌ ½ÉÈ­µÇ¾ú´Ù. 4 mmÀÇ º¸»ó ¸¸°îÀº ÃøÀýÄ¡ÀÇ Ä¡°ü ¼øÃø ¹× Ä¡±Ù ¼³Ãø À̵¿À» ÀÏÀ¸Å°°í, °ßÄ¡ÀÇ ºñÁ¶Àý¼º ÈÄ¹æ °æ»ç À̵¿À» °¨¼Ò½ÃÄ×´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀüÄ¡ºÎ°¡ ¼³Ãø °æ»çµÈ ¸ðµ¨À» ±âÁظ𵨰ú °°Àº ½ÇÇè Á¶°ÇÀ¸·Î ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ÇÑ °æ¿ì Ä¡±Ù¸éÀÇ ÀÀ·Â ºÐÆ÷¿Í 25000¹è È®´ëµÈ ±×·¡ÇÁ »ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ À̵¿ ¾ç»óÀº ¸Å¿ì À¯»çÇÏ¿´´Ù ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú´Â ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®-SWA sliding »ý¿ªÇÐÀ» ±¸»ç ½Ã °ßÀÎ ÈÅÀÇ À§Ä¡¿Í ¿ÍÀÌ¾î »óÀÇ º¸»ó ¸¸°îÀÇ À¯¹«¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀüÄ¡ºÎÀÇ Ä¡Ãà Á¶ÀýÀÌ ´Þ¶óÁö¸ç ½ÇÁ¦ ÀÓ»ó¿¡¼­ °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀ¸·Î È°¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

With development of the skeletal anchorage system, orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) assisted on masse sliding retraction has become part of general orthodontic treatment. But compared to the emphasis on successful anchorage preparation, the control of anterior teeth axis has not been emphasized enough. Methods: A 3-D finite element Base model of maxillary dental arch and a Lingual tipping model with lingually inclined anterior teeth were constructed. To evaluate factors influencing the axis of anterior teeth when OMI was used as anchorage, models were simulated with 2 mm or 5 mm retraction hooks and/or by the addition of 4 mm of compensating curve (CC) on the main archwire. The stress distribution on the roots and a 25000 times enlarged axis graph were evaluated. Results: Intrusive component of retraction force directed postero-superiorly from the 2 mm height hook did not reduce the lingual tipping of anterior teeth. When hook height was increased to 5 mm, lateral incisor showed crown-labial and root-lingual torque and uncontrolled tipping of the canine was increased.4 mm of CC added to the main archwire also induced crown-labial and root-lingual torque of the lateral incisor but uncontrolled tipping of the canine was decreased. Lingual tipping model showed very similar results compared with the Base model. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that height of the hook and compensating curve on the main archwire can influence the axis of anterior teeth. These data can be used as guidelines for clinical application.

Å°¿öµå

±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®;À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÇؼ®
Orthodontic mini-implant;SWA;En masse retraction;Finite element method

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed